All is not well with our planet as we are regularly reminded by a string of reports, the latest being the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. And the fault is ours. Though politicians make speeches paying lip service to the environment, business continues as usual. Coal is mined; forests are burned; people still fly off on holidays; the planet warms. So why can’t we free ourselves from this relentless cycle of resource overuse? Are we locked in to an economic system, depending as it does on exploitation, even though we know it’s a system that’s bound to come tumbling down (maybe taking most of us with it)? Are we trapped into pillaging of the planet’s life support systems even though we know it can’t go on?
Even now, many countries behave as if they were not all connected to and dependent on the biosphere, a lesson still not understood − particularly by nationalists. The universal excuse for doing nothing is always ‘the economy’.
So what’s being done? Not much. What are the stumbling blocks: one, ironically, is democracy because it ensures that nothing unpopular can be done; worse is outright denial that there’s a problem at all. Yet there is a way forward, difficult but possible. Otherwise we’re back to the dilemma we all face: the planet’s cry for help isn’t getting through. It seems we really are trapped.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
So what’s being done? Not much. What are the stumbling blocks: one, ironically, is democracy because it ensures that nothing unpopular can be done; worse is outright denial that there’s a problem at all.
I see where you are coming from but I'm not sure it is exactly democracy that is one of the stumbling blocks - the oil-igarchy masquerading as democracy that we have now in America is one problem. Companies like ExxonMobil have worked very hard to undermine public understanding of global warming for the last 15 years and to lay the groundwork for an oil friendly president in Bush to pull out of ratifying the Kyoto Protocol and get away with it.
Democracies work when voters are working on good information. Sadly the GW message has been muddied and most people think that reducing emissions equals reducing economic growth.
Post a Comment